From an expression of concern to a Formal Complaint
Oct 8, 2017 15:02:17 GMT -7
Admin and hiker like this
Post by Admin on Oct 8, 2017 15:02:17 GMT -7
Administrator's note: Ia Williams asked me to post her formal complaint here. It follows:
From an expression of concern to a Formal Complaint
9-27-17
Dear GLA Board Members,
Based on Charlotte Mizzi’s actions at the July and August board meetings, I find it necessary to upgrade my expression of concern, which you already have on file, to a Formal Complaint. It’s clear that the Community Property Committee (CPC) has been dissolved, but still, Mizzi must account for her actions as Chair of that committee.
My original expression of concern was about Mizzi’s continued personal conflict of interest on the CPC and how as chair of that committee she chose to spend funds with no discussion, no foreknowledge of vote in committee and with no board authorization. My Formal Complaint is about Mizzi’s unilateral 180-degree change in position at the August board meeting.
The board voted at the July 2017 board meeting, to have a mold and rodent inspection on the soccer field building. At the subsequent CPC meeting, a motion was passed to have Dorothy Keeler get a professional estimate of the cost.
At the August board meeting, when it came time for Keeler to give that report, Mizzi cut her short and emphatically declared that there would be no inspection because the building was going to be torn down. Members of the CPC who were present at the board meeting were taken aback. What caused Mizzi’s unilateral 180-degree shift from beautifying to razing the soccer field building?
Did Mizzi not remember that the board had voted for a mold and rodent inspection? Or was Mizzi deceptively promoting another of her personal agendas? Might it be that Mizzi was focused on getting the soccer field building removed, so there would be space to move another building, once used for the Thomas Moore School, to the soccer field parcel to begin to develop her dream of “parkland development?”
No matter how one might speculate, Mizzi’s unilateral actions and pronouncements show an egregious lack of professionalism/integrity: her overriding, dismissing, ignoring, and fighting with CP committee members, using John Carp as her singular man in charge, while writing her own version of the minutes or refuting minutes otherwise written by committee members. There is no goodwill in her top-down management style, which disrespects and diminishes others. Further she has the problem of dual loyalty.
Mizzi cannot give her full and utmost loyalty to GLA and simultaneously to the organization(s) in which she is “passionately” involved. The failure of Mizzi to acknowledge her conflict of interest and her inability to work collaboratively, coupled with the board’s failure to hold Mizzi accountable for her confusing, disruptive and disingenuous board service must end.
Mizzi’s problems were simply pushed under the rug when Dan Kehoe motioned to dissolve the CPC. They now need resolution.
In closing I ask that this Formal Complaint be investigated and resolved in a way that best serves all landowners. The board has already censured Mizzi. How much more damage do landowners have to endure before the board asks her to step down?
Thank you,
Ia Williams
Post note: And now Charlotte Mizzi has finally come clean as to her true agenda. Read her bio and you will see for yourself. While the 20 acre soccer field area is owned by the landowners at large, and remains mired in legal issues, she plans to push forward with her agenda to develop the 20 acres, replete with spa, health center, swimming pool, community center, etc.
A couple months ago she informed me that she has been “talking to people” and over 51% are supporting her agenda. When I asked what people she was talking to she would not answer.
From an expression of concern to a Formal Complaint
9-27-17
Dear GLA Board Members,
Based on Charlotte Mizzi’s actions at the July and August board meetings, I find it necessary to upgrade my expression of concern, which you already have on file, to a Formal Complaint. It’s clear that the Community Property Committee (CPC) has been dissolved, but still, Mizzi must account for her actions as Chair of that committee.
My original expression of concern was about Mizzi’s continued personal conflict of interest on the CPC and how as chair of that committee she chose to spend funds with no discussion, no foreknowledge of vote in committee and with no board authorization. My Formal Complaint is about Mizzi’s unilateral 180-degree change in position at the August board meeting.
The board voted at the July 2017 board meeting, to have a mold and rodent inspection on the soccer field building. At the subsequent CPC meeting, a motion was passed to have Dorothy Keeler get a professional estimate of the cost.
At the August board meeting, when it came time for Keeler to give that report, Mizzi cut her short and emphatically declared that there would be no inspection because the building was going to be torn down. Members of the CPC who were present at the board meeting were taken aback. What caused Mizzi’s unilateral 180-degree shift from beautifying to razing the soccer field building?
Did Mizzi not remember that the board had voted for a mold and rodent inspection? Or was Mizzi deceptively promoting another of her personal agendas? Might it be that Mizzi was focused on getting the soccer field building removed, so there would be space to move another building, once used for the Thomas Moore School, to the soccer field parcel to begin to develop her dream of “parkland development?”
No matter how one might speculate, Mizzi’s unilateral actions and pronouncements show an egregious lack of professionalism/integrity: her overriding, dismissing, ignoring, and fighting with CP committee members, using John Carp as her singular man in charge, while writing her own version of the minutes or refuting minutes otherwise written by committee members. There is no goodwill in her top-down management style, which disrespects and diminishes others. Further she has the problem of dual loyalty.
Mizzi cannot give her full and utmost loyalty to GLA and simultaneously to the organization(s) in which she is “passionately” involved. The failure of Mizzi to acknowledge her conflict of interest and her inability to work collaboratively, coupled with the board’s failure to hold Mizzi accountable for her confusing, disruptive and disingenuous board service must end.
Mizzi’s problems were simply pushed under the rug when Dan Kehoe motioned to dissolve the CPC. They now need resolution.
In closing I ask that this Formal Complaint be investigated and resolved in a way that best serves all landowners. The board has already censured Mizzi. How much more damage do landowners have to endure before the board asks her to step down?
Thank you,
Ia Williams
Post note: And now Charlotte Mizzi has finally come clean as to her true agenda. Read her bio and you will see for yourself. While the 20 acre soccer field area is owned by the landowners at large, and remains mired in legal issues, she plans to push forward with her agenda to develop the 20 acres, replete with spa, health center, swimming pool, community center, etc.
A couple months ago she informed me that she has been “talking to people” and over 51% are supporting her agenda. When I asked what people she was talking to she would not answer.