|
|
Post by Poor Richard on Jul 11, 2022 19:09:47 GMT -7
GLA Offered two million dollars for SG Parcels Not one director could be bothered to vote for the one million dollar offer
A motion was offered three days ago by Director Brockett for the GLA to take the steps needed to sell South Glastonbury parcels 96 and 102 for one million dollars. Not one director could be bothered to vote yes or no. So the offer has been increased to two million dollars and presented as a motion to the GLA Board.
Two million dollars is more money than the GLA has garnered in landowner assessments in the past 15 years total. Two million could bring every platted road in Glastonbury up to Park County standards. Existing paved roads could be repaved. Ditches dug, culverts replaced and cleaned, fresh gravel everywhere. Washboards could be a relic of the past when the GLA had to scrape by and perform band-aid road maintenance.
We will keep you posted on the results of this motion. |
|
|
|
Post by dorothykeeler on Jul 12, 2022 3:23:09 GMT -7
This post is disturbing in a number of ways. I sold real estate in Alaska for 10 years, and after checking around, I learned that Director Tim Brockett is the person offering to buy the two parcels for two million dollars.
Tim Brockett is "Poor Richard," and on May 19th, he claimed that something "fishy" was going on because the parcels in question were not on the GLA's Balance Sheet. (https://glastonbury.freeforums.net/thread/1643/17-dollars-gla-financial-statements?page=1&scrollTo=3142)
Here's the "fishy" part. In his May post, Tim claimed the two parcels were worth about 17 million dollars. Tim's first offer was apparently one million dollars, after claiming it was worth 17 million dollars in May.
Tim is a sitting GLA Board member. It is highly misleading and a massive conflict of interest to not disclose that HE is making the offer to buy the land, and then infer that something nefarious is going on because "not one director bothered to vote."
What is Tim's real motive? The only reason I can think of is that the vote to determine whether to split North and South Glastonbury is coming up, and dangling this offer might be Tim's way to sway the vote.
I would welcome hearing from anyone else as to what his motivation could be...
|
|
