Post by montana on Jul 24, 2022 19:21:17 GMT -7
These are the people that I suggest that you consider for your choices.
Sabrina Hanan write in for North(we need new blood on the Board)
Doug Gill on the ballot for North (we need new blood on the Board)
Leo Keeler write in for South
Scott Stomiersowski on the ballot for South (we need new blood on the Board)
Claudette Dirkers has done an outstanding job as a Director and should be reelected.
She has been wearing many hats for the Board.
Linda Ulrich for Ombudsman for North
Someone who was the on the Road Committee is on the ballot again for North, he was fired from their past job of being on the Road Committe for doing a poor job, why would you give them another chance this time of being a Director?
I am not talking about Claudette Dirkers she has done an outstanding job
being on the Road Committee.
Four individuals are running for South, Mark Seaver/husband, Andrea Sedlak /wife, Jeff Ladewig and Dennis Riley they already have an agenda to split or dissolve the GLA. If this is not your choice, why would you even consider voting for them?
Two alternatives to the four individuals above would be Scott Stomierowski on the ballot for South and Leo Keeler as a write in for South.
Two of the people that are running for the Board voted for a rule that stops, Board members from disseminating information to the Landowners.
Rule 2.01
Why would you vote for them?
Dennis Riley and Andrea Sedlak voted for this GAG LAW.
I don't believe that a Board member would or should divulge any personal information about anyone to another landowner but I do believe that information that a LANDOWNER should know about how things are going on various things happening within the Board might not get out to the LANDOWNERS, if there was a RULE blocking open and honest Board members from sharing what was going on.
Rule 2.01 should be removed.
Here is the link, check it out
www.glamontana.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bm1209m.pdf
Scroll to "9. Finished Business, #3."
Then at the end of the minutes you'll see Rule 2.01, that was cited in the motion made Nov. 27, 2019 under Finished business,#3.
Someone from NORTH is running to be Director, they mentioned church. The Church has no place in this election. But if you want to bring up church, currently there are more non church members than church members. Harmony was a word that church people used and it's a word that is currently used by church members. If you are part of the church you are in, if you are not part of the church you are subservient to church members.
Joe Bezotsky
I am running for the Board in North.
I am not perfect, but I will do my best.
Sabrina Hanan write in for North(we need new blood on the Board)
Doug Gill on the ballot for North (we need new blood on the Board)
Leo Keeler write in for South
Scott Stomiersowski on the ballot for South (we need new blood on the Board)
Claudette Dirkers has done an outstanding job as a Director and should be reelected.
She has been wearing many hats for the Board.
Linda Ulrich for Ombudsman for North
Someone who was the on the Road Committee is on the ballot again for North, he was fired from their past job of being on the Road Committe for doing a poor job, why would you give them another chance this time of being a Director?
I am not talking about Claudette Dirkers she has done an outstanding job
being on the Road Committee.
Four individuals are running for South, Mark Seaver/husband, Andrea Sedlak /wife, Jeff Ladewig and Dennis Riley they already have an agenda to split or dissolve the GLA. If this is not your choice, why would you even consider voting for them?
Two alternatives to the four individuals above would be Scott Stomierowski on the ballot for South and Leo Keeler as a write in for South.
Two of the people that are running for the Board voted for a rule that stops, Board members from disseminating information to the Landowners.
Rule 2.01
Why would you vote for them?
Dennis Riley and Andrea Sedlak voted for this GAG LAW.
I don't believe that a Board member would or should divulge any personal information about anyone to another landowner but I do believe that information that a LANDOWNER should know about how things are going on various things happening within the Board might not get out to the LANDOWNERS, if there was a RULE blocking open and honest Board members from sharing what was going on.
Rule 2.01 should be removed.
Here is the link, check it out
www.glamontana.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bm1209m.pdf
Scroll to "9. Finished Business, #3."
Then at the end of the minutes you'll see Rule 2.01, that was cited in the motion made Nov. 27, 2019 under Finished business,#3.
Someone from NORTH is running to be Director, they mentioned church. The Church has no place in this election. But if you want to bring up church, currently there are more non church members than church members. Harmony was a word that church people used and it's a word that is currently used by church members. If you are part of the church you are in, if you are not part of the church you are subservient to church members.
Joe Bezotsky
I am running for the Board in North.
I am not perfect, but I will do my best.